Independent & peer-reviewed

The evidence behind Angulus

Angulus isn't just marketed as accurate — its measurements have been used and formally evaluated in independent, peer-reviewed research across clinical specialties. Here's the record.

40+
Published studies
2021–2026
Six years of use
up to 0.99
ICC reliability
8
Clinical domains
Reliability & validity

Studies that measured Angulus itself

Several groups specifically tested Angulus's reliability and validity against reference methods — including manual goniometry and radiographic assessment. These are the headline results.

Quadriceps (Q) angleHealthy women, n=50
ICC 0.98–0.99 · r=0.99
Aafreen et al., 2024 — Int J Ther Rehabil · source ↗
Rearfoot & medial arch angleConcurrent validity, n=100
ICC 0.96–0.97 · r=0.73–0.84
Chaturvedi et al., 2026 — Rev Pesq Fisio · source ↗
Proximal femur physisRadiographs, n=378
0.79–0.92 inter-observer
Garg et al., 2025 — J Clin Orthop Trauma · source ↗
Hypospadias curvatureInter-observer, n=52
R = 0.983
Mosa et al., 2022 — J Pediatr Urol · source ↗
Head-load posture changeInter-rater, n=100
0.90 inter-rater
Kurten et al., 2022 — Occup Health SA · source ↗
Thoracolumbar spine ROMLow back pain, n=64
ICC 0.71–0.83 intra
Aburub et al., 2025 — Int J Ther Rehabil · source ↗
Elbow & wrist ROMvs. photogrammetry
Matches manual goniometry
Quintero-Diaz et al., 2025 — Phys Ther Rev · source ↗
Wrist flexion & extensionValidity study (named "Angulus")
Reliability & validity
Porkodi et al., 2023 — IEEE AISP · source ↗
How to read this: ICC (intraclass correlation) and r/R values closer to 1.0 indicate stronger agreement. Values above 0.90 are generally considered excellent reliability. Where a study reported a range across movements or raters, the full range is shown.
The full record

Studies by clinical domain

A selection of independent publications that used or evaluated Angulus, grouped by area. Each links to the original paper.

Upper limb — shoulder, elbow, wrist & hand

11 studies
Quintero-Diaz et al., 2025 · Physical Therapy Reviews
≈ manual gonioPaper ↗
Fu et al., 2024 · J Med Internet Res, 26
reviewPaper ↗

Knee & lower limb

5 studies
Swiss Ball vs. McKenzie Exercise among Football Players with Anterior Pelvic Tilt
Mahenthiran & Ramalingam, 2024 · Indian J Physiother Occup Ther, 18
n=30

Foot & ankle

3 studies
Septiani et al., 2025 · Medical Journal of Nusantara, 4(1)
Jain et al., 2021 · Int J Paediatr Orthop, 7(3)
n=18 anklesPaper ↗

Spine, neck & posture

4 studies
Kurten et al., 2022 · Occup Health Southern Africa, 28(6)
0.90 inter-ratern=100Paper ↗
Septiani et al., 2026 · Gaster J Health Sci, 24(1)

Pediatric surgery & urology

2 studies

Occupational ergonomics & work posture

7 studies
Koeswara & Rahmah, 2025 · Agroindustrial Technology J, 9(1)
Hikmah & Asyfiradayati, 2026 · Int J Sci Environ, 6(1)
Ardityawan & Purwaningsih, 2025 · Industrial Eng Online J, 14(2)
Herdiana & Nugraha, 2023 · Jurnal Serambi Engineering, 8
Rahdiana et al., 2022 · Spektrum Industri, 20

Rehabilitation & telehealth

1 study
Elibol & Bakırhan, 2024 · Telerehabilitation, Springer Nature

Beyond the clinic — research breadth

4 studies
Buongiorno & Michelini, 2021 · Atti Accad Peloritana, 99
Saffian et al., 2022 · Malaysian Journal of Music, 11
About this list. These are independent, third-party publications that used or evaluated Angulus; their authors are not affiliated with Angulus and inclusion here does not imply endorsement. Findings and conclusions belong to the respective authors. This is a curated selection — for the complete, continually updated bibliography see the full research index ↗. Spotted a study we've missed? Let us know.
Angulus

Measure with confidence

Put the same tool clinicians publish with in your own pocket. Free on iOS and Android.

Get Angulus